View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nick
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 494
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought the whole reason for the Scheinder Xenar was it's a budget lens. Stuck in my brain is the idea Kodak started using some german lenses to save money post war. I also have the same thought stuck about Graflex using them for the same reason. Also I don't think Scheinder QC had the greatest rep for quite awhile. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Henry
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1646 Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Results with my Graftar were pretty good; I was pleasantly surprised. The lens and shutter are in pristine condition, as was the Century itself when I bought it; I doubt if either were used much.
I'm seriously contemplating doing some hand-held work (I just re-installed the frame finder, which I had removed to allow increased movements with the 65mm), after I re-calibrate the Kalart for the 103. That self-cocking Century (i.e., Wolly) shutter is the cat's meow. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|