| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		78ltd
 
 
  Joined: 04 Sep 2005 Posts: 62 Location: Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 12:01 am    Post subject: YES | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| Yup, my early Singers have a silver colored wind lever with the notation panel on top instead of on the carriage like the General Precisions. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		SYNCHROJAMES
 
 
  Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 Location: SAN DIEGO CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:11 pm    Post subject: Roll Backs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I have two roll backs-#1 RH-10, SINGER, date code M2A, black aluminum? lever, notation spot on center of lever hub, textured surfaces top & bottom, shell marked GRAFLEX/SUBSEA, no date mark, alignment lugs so that roll holder goes in one way, darkslide flush with edge of base.
 
 
#2 RH-10, GENERAL PRECISION, date code F0E, blue plastic lever, rectangular notation spot left of winder dial, smooth surfaces top & bottom, shell unmarked, but matching date code F0E, blue dot by darkslide, no alignment lugs, darkslide extends 1/2" past base edge, no grip, just a hole, black on one side.  
 
    I found someone locally selling a SINGER RH-20 (no base) for $50-is it possible to run 120 film in a 220 back?  That would provide more options out in the field.
 
James | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Les
 
 
  Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:35 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				For a while Graflex marked the 6x7cm cases as RH-10 and RH-20, so that would lead you to believe it's not only possible but Graflex approved. 
 
 
but I did find a single statement in Tim Holden's personal notes that said they weren't. But no indication of why. I suspect film flatness as the 220 doesn't have the paper backing, but it could also be any number of other things. _________________ "In order to invent, you need a good imagination and a lot of junk" Thomas Edison | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		1banjo
 
 
  Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 492 Location: kansas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:57 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				hey all
 
minty brands of cameras take 120 or 220 ! 220 film is thicker then 120 & stronger
 
as you are pulling on it not the paper like 120 ! I use 120 in my RH20 all the time
 
as of yet to see any problums in doing it!
 
as to using a RH 10 shell with a RH20 insert it works & so does a RH20 shell with
 
RH10 insert.
 
 
banjo | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		SYNCHROJAMES
 
 
  Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 Location: SAN DIEGO CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:25 pm    Post subject: Roll backs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I checked KODAK & ILFORD and neither one lists 220 film-whatever is out there in the stores is it.  I may still pick up the RH-20, as it appears to have less mileage than either of mine.
 
James | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Henry
 
 
  Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1650 Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		SYNCHROJAMES
 
 
  Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 Location: SAN DIEGO CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:16 pm    Post subject: Roll film back | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I went back and scooped up the RH-20 back-even better than I had hoped!  In its original box, with an extra MIL-SPEC type label.  date on label (8/75) matches date code (H5A). felt on pressure spring shows no discernable wear, and empty spool is metal. My guess is maybe 1-2 rolls thru it, if that much. Now I have a spare in case my other backs die.
 
 
James   | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Henry
 
 
  Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1650 Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:19 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| So what would happen if you ran a roll of 120 through a 220 roll film back? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		1banjo
 
 
  Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 492 Location: kansas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:51 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				hey 
 
it works fine for me I do it all the time the presser plate is spring load !
 
the 220 film is thicker then the 120
 
 SO 120 + paper is about the same thickness as 220 film
 
as long as the film is up tight your good
 
 
banjo | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		45PSS
 
 
  Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 9:52 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				And you run out of film at frame count 10 instead of frame count 20. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Henry
 
 
  Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1650 Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:21 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | 45PSS wrote: | 	 		  | And you run out of film at frame count 10 instead of frame count 20. | 	  
 
 
Um, right. I was wondering about frame spacing, and I should have asked that specific question in my previous post. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		1banjo
 
 
  Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 492 Location: kansas
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 6:27 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				yes  but you mite get a #11 but it mite only be a 6x6
 
 
I shot frame 11 knowing that I mite not get much 
 
 
banjo | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |