View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2134 Location: New Jersey
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
(http://www.mcmahanphoto.com/lc380.html)
Camera being used in portrait position by the man on the right is a Top Handle Speed Graphic;
(http://www.avlispub.com/garage/apollo_1_launch.htm)
Camera in the side bar being held by Arch Smith is a RB Auto.
Dan,
a recent Pacemaker Speed CLA shutter produced accurately exposed negatives at the 1000 and 500 settings even though a shutter speed tester showed them to be slow. Leaf shutters that tested slow produced very dense negatives compared to speeds that tested accurate.
I suggest testing FPS with film at each or questioned speeds against a leaf shutter that test or is known to be accurate.
Interesting article. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2134 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Charles, as I've told you several times the shutter speeds don't respond to the tension setting. They respond as expected to slit width.
The problem with my RB's shutter speeds isn't that they're slow. It is that there are only four of them.
At this point the shutter speed issue is moot. Until I reconcile myself to shooting 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 (or less) instead of 2 1/4 x 3 1/4, the project is dead. Vignetting that seems to be inherent in the setup is a killer.
What bothers me about most this is that I've seen no complaints about vignetting with 4x5 or 5x7 Berthas. It could be that I don't understand what causes the vignetting. Or it could be that there's something in the geometry of larger Graflexes that's different from that of the 2x3 RB Series B. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Suggestion: switch out the 4 inch PVC to 6 inch or 8 inch black ABS. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2134 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Charles, thanks for the suggestion. The tubes' diameter isn't the problem. A 2.25" x 3.25" rectangle will fit in a 4" tube.
The mirror box is the problem. It is low and close to the film plane. That's why I get worse vignetting in portrait orientation than in landscape.
It isn't a problem with the short lenses normally fitted to the 2x3 RB Ser B. It is a problem with long lenses.
Here's how to think of it. The lens projects a cone of rays. To cover the format, the cone of rays has to be 4" in diameter at the film plane. If you have a 2x3 RB Ser B, measure the mirror box and its distance from the film plane. If you don't, accept my measurements. They're in the article. Now calculate how tall a cone whose base is 4" in diameter and that just clears the mirror box can be. And then you'll understand why long lenses can't be hung far out in front of a 2x3 RB Ser B and cover the format. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am aware that a lens projects light in a cone shape, that camera bellows are larger than the format of the camera and some are tapered from the front standard to the rear of the bellows. Some of this size difference allows for movements. I did pick up a 2x3 Series B and some RFH's for a reasonable price but it will be a few days to weeks before I can get around to measuring, calculating ratios, and making further constructive suggestions.
More to follow someday. _________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arslan1
Joined: 08 Jan 2015 Posts: 1 Location: caneda
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:11 pm Post subject: Help |
|
|
Dan,
a recent Pacemaker Speed CLA shutter produced accurately exposed negatives at the 1000 and 500 settings even though a shutter speed tester showed them to be slow. Leaf shutters that tested slow produced very dense negatives compared to speeds that tested accurate.
I suggest testing FPS with film at each or questioned speeds against a leaf shutter that test or is known to be accurate.
Interesting article. _________________ Arslan1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2134 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arslan, I have a Calumet shutter speed tester and know how to use it. It is accurate.
In addition, I've shot E6 film in it and got good exposures when I used the shutter speeds as measured. More reason to believe that my shutter speed tester is accurate.
The sad fact is that the shutter speeds don't respond to changes in the tension setting.
Another sad fact is that because of the way the camera is built the shutter box vignettes very badly with long lenses. The camera can't be used as I wanted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
choiliefan
Joined: 24 Dec 2013 Posts: 18 Location: United States
|
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dan,
Can you share any photos illustrative of the vignetting? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2134 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, no. I shot one roll for test and that was that. End of project. Never scanned. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arthurwg
Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 20 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did see one in the window of a Manhattan camera shop awhile back. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|