View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have just recieved a 'new' camera that came with an unknown lens mounted in a Regno shutter (by Wollensak). Amazingly, the shutter works, almost...
The speed selector will move and set the first 3 speeds (from the right side, not T & B). But it won't move past the third speed. Feels like it's hitting a stop?
So I thought before I take the cover off the shutter that I better ask here first to see if anyone is familiar with these old shutters?
Is it just possible there's a trick to moving the speed selector?
Will a thousand springs fly out of the case if I take the cover off?
I hope to get it apart in the next day or two, so if noone has any info, I'll just put on the safety glasses and grab a screw driver, and drill, and hammer & chissel, and maybe the Dremel... and go at it
Thanks if anyone may have some info...
Rich...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hurdy_gurdyman
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 44 Location: Central Michigan
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Rich,
I have an old Regno shutter. Don't know if it's the same as yours or not. I've had it opened a few times. It's a pretty simple shutter with no parts flying out at you when it's opened. Mine just needed cleaning and a small lever repositioned that had slid over a part it wasn't supposed to. It now works well, abiet 2 stops slow at all speeds.
Good luck with yours.
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for that info!
I've had quite a few shutters open and do clean them myself, but I hate to go in blind... Hopefully, a little later I'll get the shutter up here and pop open the cover to see why the speed selector stops where it shouldn't. This lens/shutter may not ever be used, but I hate things that don't work if they can be fixed. And who knows how good the lens may turn out to be? At worst, it may make a nice soft portrait lens
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well this mystery has been solved. Turns out the shutter was apparently "fixed" at some point. There's three screws that hold it together from the back side. One happens to be shorter than the other two. The two longer stick out from the font side by a thread. Yep, one of the longer screws was put through the hole that sits right in the middle of the speed settings and the selector was hitting it...
Now it works fine from 1 sec through 1/25. 1/50 and 1/100 are about the same as 1/25. So at least it's got 4 selectable speeds
Unfortunately, the lens looks like it's got some fungus. I have no idea what the lens is. Might be in the 12 inch range, f/7.7 through f/256. Looks like two elements, air spaced. And there doesn't look like there's any possible way to seperate the elements to get at the fungus... But it still might make a nice 'soft' lens, at 4 speeds
And a comment (of course). The Regno shutter has a typical set lever and a release lever. But the remote release is AIR operated! I like that! Much smoother and less shakey than a cable release. Why didn't they keep air releases???
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nick
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 494
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2004-09-08 10:31, RichS wrote:
I have no idea what the lens is. Might be in the 12 inch range, f/7.7 through f/256.
But the remote release is AIR operated! I like that! Much smoother and less shakey than a cable release. Why didn't they keep air releases???
|
F/256? Could that be one of the older F/stops systems? We've still got air release cables. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sounds like US (unified system) stops to me.
f16=US16
so
8 11 16 22 32 45 90
4 8 16 32 64 128 256
US 7.7 is about f12 which seems slow.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya got me?
The listed stops are:
7.7 8 16 32 64 128 256
Past the 7.7, it looks like the old system and probably is. But the 7.7 seems odd?
Doesn't look like a 'slow' lens. Viewed from the rear, the aperture is 31mm wide open, the lens element is 41mm, but it's got a paint vignet at 37mm. Front cell is 40mm...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was wrong. US 7.7 is a bit wider than US 8 which is f11.
that makes 7.7 something around f9 or 10 not f12.
If the aperture is 31mm and it's an f10 lens than the focal lenght should be around 310mm or 12 inch lens. Yeah the front element does magnifiy a bit so the "entrance pupil" is not exactly 31mm, but this is close enough.
It's unusual that the elements are in a mount that's "rolled" shut. Usually that happens much later. are there threads in the front? maybe the cell was front loaded.
Les
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2004-09-08 15:38, Les wrote:
I was wrong. US 7.7 is a bit wider than US 8 which is f11.
that makes 7.7 something around f9 or 10 not f12.
If the aperture is 31mm and it's an f10 lens than the focal lenght should be around 310mm or 12 inch lens. Yeah the front element does magnifiy a bit so the "entrance pupil" is not exactly 31mm, but this is close enough.
It's unusual that the elements are in a mount that's "rolled" shut. Usually that happens much later. are there threads in the front? maybe the cell was front loaded.
Les
|
So the aperture may work out, but I don't think the elements will...
Yep, it's got front threads, and I had initial hopes for that. But inspection with 8x shows absolutely no evidence of the "ring" being a seperate piece that was screwed in. Looks one-piece machined. The threads end to two thin ribs, on to a concave curve to three ribd to the glass.
On the rear, the thread stop to a barrel about 3mm high, then curve over the glass.
I can't see anything that looks like it's screwed together, and I find it odd that there's no markings, unless there was another ring screwed into the front that had info inscribed?
I have a couple of convertibles that have rolled-in elements and I'll hva eot dig them out and compare. Got a Gundlach Rapid Rectograph sitting here that's similar, but that has a flat front ring with the inscription and it's not screwed in. The roll-over is different too... But I'm thinking that this glass is rolled-in...
The rear element is odd too. Same construction but it has external thread along with the internal. At the bottom of the external threads is a ribbed ring. Looks like it was made to grip & turn, and obviously had something screwed to the external threads. Maybe it was two elements screwed together? I doubt it though... Maybe just a brass ring?
May be just a mystery?
I can hopefully date the camera, and if the sticker is legitimate, it was used by the military in 1941-1942. And it has a replacement bellows that I give a date to the mid 50's. So who kows where the lens came from?
[ This Message was edited by: RichS on 2004-09-08 16:33 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
any chance for some nice photos? just okay Photos?
And just what the heck was the camera? 2D?
I could be wrong, but I didn't think Regno shutters made it past the depression, so I'm guessing the shutter if not the lens is from the 30s. If the front and rear are the same it sounds like a dialyte type lens (4 elements, no cement, air spaced, al a Celor, artar, 203 Ektar. Graphic Anastigmat.) BTW these were popular lens in f10. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2004-09-08 18:15, Les wrote:
any chance for some nice photos? just okay Photos?
And just what the heck was the camera? 2D?
I could be wrong, but I didn't think Regno shutters made it past the depression, so I'm guessing the shutter if not the lens is from the 30s. If the front and rear are the same it sounds like a dialyte type lens (4 elements, no cement, air spaced, al a Celor, artar, 203 Ektar. Graphic Anastigmat.) BTW these were popular lens in f10.
|
Okay, but remember, you did ask for them
"Nice"?, I doubt it
This camera is the 8x10 Century Universal "Spy camera" from the OSS!
The front & rear are not identical. The front cell has a convex outer element with a flat rear element and is maybe 1mm larger in diameter. The rear cell is flat, both front & rear. This makes me wonder?
And "Duh!", there's a tape marker on the baseplate that reads "10 in". I have no doubt this would indicate this len's focal length.
If it works, here's the pics of the lens/shutter:
Close-up of the f-stop scale
The whole thing.
Front of cells. Rear on left.
Rear of cells. Rear on left.
Yes, they're cut off on the left side... Shows how long it's been since I used that old digital cam
[ This Message was edited by: RichS on 2004-09-08 20:45 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hurdy_gurdyman
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 44 Location: Central Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm, that Regno shutter is a lot different from my much smaller one. Mine has a pair of shiny buttons on the top, one for cocking the shutter, and one for tripping it. It only has a 6 1/2 inch (Luxar) lens in it, and probably only made for 4 x 5 film at the most. I suspect mine is much older.
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's very possible that the Regno went through some incarnations and "improvements" through the years. I was even suprised to see the Wollensak name on mine as I thought Regno was a different company?
And a further note about the element mounting. Turns out those front inside "threads" are actually concentric rings... So nothing was ever screwed into the front, which kinda confirms that the elements are 'rolled' into the mounting... It makes it odd though that there are no markings at all on the lens. Maybe it was a special government order by the OSS so it couldn't be traced
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|