Graflex.org

[riochico]

Being able to adapt and make good photos is not always the same as doing what you are supposed to do, right? I would like to use my venerable Super graphic to make some photos on a lightweight Manfrotto 718B tripod. What I am not sure about is if the tripod can manage the weight. According to the specs on the Graflex.org web site the weight of the Super Grpahic is 2.4 kilos, while the recommended maximum weight for the tripod is 2.5 kilos, pretty close, no. The specs on the Graflex webs site and the photos of the Super Graphic camera on the same page is a complete system including a Lens (Ektar 127mm F4.7) and rotating back, but I am not sure if these two items are included in the specified weight of the camera. Yes, I know a saner person would just get a bigger tripod, for many obvious reasons. What I am trying to do is figure out is can I get away with making a few straight shots using this tripod/camera with exposures of up to 1 second without camera shake and or destroying the tripod the first time I use it. I am optimistic, as Manfrotto(Bogen) uses good materials, but would like your advice before I try it. Thanks, Peter

[t.r.sanford]

I haven't tried the modern tripods made of esoteric materials, but all the old ones I've owned over the decades have withstood the weight of cameras too heavy for them, without damage. They often don't perform very satisfactorily that way, but they tolerate the abuse.

I've mounted a 4x5 "Speed" and a "View II" on a 4-section Gitzo "Tatalux" that really was designed for 35mm. or smallish 120 rollfilm cameras. I wouldn't try this in a high wind, nor for extremely long exposures, but it works very well in everyday situations.

[Nick]

One thing that's different is a tripod speced for 2.5kgs with a 35mm camera is likely intended for a camera with a longish lens. That's a lot less stable IMHO then something like a press camera with a small lens.

I actually think you need a better tripod for 35mm then 4x5 with normal lens.

[t.r.sanford]

Yes indeed; the old paradox -- that the most portable cameras require the least portable tripods -- remains true today. If the available tripod is rigid enough to support the camera without sagging visibly, I'm inclined to just use it, without regard to manufacturer recommendations.