View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Charles Barringer
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 4 Location: NJ, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: Graflex KE-4; Ektar 2.5"/4.5 |
|
|
I just got a 2 1/2" optical assembly for KE-4 from the great auction site and was wondering a few things. Serial number is RM189.
Does anyone have info on the optical design of this lens? Any ideas of total production of this lens? Or of any of the elements of the system? Any good links for more info about the KE-4 / 6 systems?
Does anyone have a clue if the focusing mechanism / bayo mount for the 4" lens might fit the 2.5" or be adaptable to it? (Actually, I might as well ask if anyone has a spare focusing mount for the 2.5" they would part with, or an organ donor needing new glass.)
Could someone send either a scan from a publication or some pictures of the complete lens so I could see what I should be aiming for?
thanks _________________ Charlie |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since I only handled one these cameras once and Todd Gustavson was looking over my shoulder when I did it, I can really say much about switching mounts between the 2.5 and 4" lens. I have some literature (a civilian brochure and a reprint of a review from US Camera) but they talk in generalities keeping lens formulas to themselves.
I also have an engineer's paper on the rangefinder and coupling system of the "Graphic 70" (civilian name) and while it's heavy in detail and math, I don't think that's what you are looking for either.
Production is sketchy, the military accepted 490 out of a 500 unit contract, though it seems they allotted 1000 serial numbers for the civilian model, how many were actually made is anybody's guess, though the retail price of the outfit being $1850 in 1955 probably kept production low (adjusted for inflation, that's $14K+, almost makes the MSRP of $8000 for a Nikon D3x look cheap........almost.)
Photos I can help you with. they aren't the best, but the best I can do for now. look quickly because my dear old ISP is closing this server on the 19th and the link will die. They gave me a new site, but it's flash based and I haven't figured out where to put the AG1's in to make it work yet.
I also have the military service manual but it's on microfiche and I don't have any way of scanning/copying a 1cm square and make it readable. If I have time, maybe I can to a quick scan with my old microscope and see if any lens diagrams show up.
(camera, flash, and three lenses)
http://home.twmi.rr.com/lnphoto/combat70web.jpg
close up of the wide angle lens:
http://home.twmi.rr.com/lnphoto/combat70ektarweb.jpg _________________ "In order to invent, you need a good imagination and a lot of junk" Thomas Edison |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Charles Barringer
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 4 Location: NJ, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:55 pm Post subject: 2.5" Ektar for KE-4 |
|
|
Thanks for the info and the images, Les. The shot of the 2.5 is very helpful as it gives me an idea of the proportions of the original to use as a guide in my reconstruction efforts. _________________ Charlie |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
scifan
Joined: 21 Dec 2005 Posts: 21 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The focussing mount from the 4" lens would not work on this camera.You will have to find an original mount for this lens if you want to use it on the combat graphic.This lens is the rarest of the three made for the 70mm combat graphic.I wish you luck in finding the parts to repair the lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Charles Barringer
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 4 Location: NJ, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:54 pm Post subject: 2.5" Ektar for KE-4 |
|
|
Thanks for confirming what I had already determined about the unsuitability of the 4" focusing mount for this lens. I realize that it will require a miracle to find the missing components for this lens (or to find a complete one), but hope springs eternal. Thanks. _________________ Charlie |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
scifan
Joined: 21 Dec 2005 Posts: 21 Location: saskatchewan
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Total production of this lens is probably only a few hundred units. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Charles Barringer
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 4 Location: NJ, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:06 pm Post subject: 2.5" Ektar for KE-4 |
|
|
That confirms what I had heard. That's also the reason I snagged this one even though incomplete, figuring that a bird in the hand ... even though the lens as such is useless for its intended function.
I intend to jury-rig it so I can test it out on my baby Speed, just to see if the short, wide Ektar is where it should be, optically.
The reflections suggest a symmetrical 4-element lens - 8 a/g surfaces 6 of which have similar curvatures and 2 much flatter. I remain interested in learning more about the optical construction if anyone can help. _________________ Charlie |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
pinelakes09
Joined: 31 Mar 2010 Posts: 1 Location: north fort myers, fl
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:33 am Post subject: ks-6/ke-4 |
|
|
just purchased ks-6 still camera set in original case, seems like everything is there including ke-4 camera, lenses, flash, etc but don't really known what should be included. great case and mint condiion. what do I do next. any thoughts bob at pinelakes09@comcast.net _________________ have located complete ks-6(1) still camera set in original case including ke-4(1) camera |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
C. Henry
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 360 Location: North East Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For what its worth the "RM" in the serial number translates to a 1953 date of manufacture for the lens.
C. Henry |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|