View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tiltall ED
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 6 Location: Olympic Peninsula Wa. gateway to heaven
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like some help on the following three lenses, for a Speed Graphic.
While I know Wollensak made lenses for Graflex, and the Graflex Optar 135mm. f./4.7 , synchromatic Rapax shutter, most often came with a Graflex. These other two, I would like to know more about.
1. a Raptar WA 108mm. f./ 6.8 , Rapax synchro shutter ?
2. a Antistigmatic Extreme WA 159mm. f./ 12.5- f./ 45, Rapax shutter ?
Are these # O, 1, or 3's Shutters? and what lensboard opening would I need for each? And would the two have a large enough image circle dia. for the 4x5?
All Three, are in Wollensak lined cases, but have been in a safety deposit box for the past 45 years, they all look brand new! They seem like odd sizes to me, and I've not seen them listed or any info on them. Can someone fill me in? Thanks!!
_________________ Only you and a camera, can capture an image, a moment of time, in a fraction of time! Why wait?
"Oh babe!, you're a hefty one!, spread your legs, raise up a little, turn to the left, and now right! You're the most beautiful.... tripod I use! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
glennfromwy
Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 Location: S.W. Wyoming
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The lenses aren't in shutters that conform to modern size standards. You'll just have to measure the diameter of the mount threads and have boards drilled to order. Both should cover 4X5 with room to spare. It wouldn't surprise me if the 159mm extreme wide angle might cover 8X10 easily.
_________________ Glenn
"Wyoming - Where everybody is somebody else's weirdo" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chaska
Joined: 16 Oct 2003 Posts: 3 Location: Charlotte, NC
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 159 is a wide angle for 8X10, mine is the f9.5 version and is mounted in a synchro compur shutter. Don't know about the 108 but cameraeccentric.com has some catalogs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TiltallED
Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 9 Location: Pacific NW, Olympic Peninsula
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you, for the replys!
As it turned out, I wound up with two Wollensak #2 syncromatic shutters, one being a Rapax, with the 4 1/4" (108 mm.) f/ 6.8 Raptar wide angle. And the other a Graphex, with the Graflex Optar 135 mm. f/ 4.7, they both have the syncromatic selector, reading as from left to right;
( black M, red M, red F & black X, and black OFF positions) for flash bulbs and strobe/ electronic.
So to use with flash bulbs, I'll need selenoids and none with strobe's, from what I've read here. Is that correct?
One other question, to mount these to #0 boards, ( 1 mm. thick ) Can the locking ring be turned around if the hole in the board is just large enough (34 mm.) for the shutter threads, and the flange of the ring snuged up tight to the back of the board? As old as both of these are, they have not been mounted on boards before. I think they should be used, and not kept in a safety deposit box.
Since I first posted, I bought two other newer lenses for the Speed Graphic, both are in # 1 copal shutters, and they need boards also. 1) is Rodenstock Geronar MC 210 mm. f / 6.8, and 2) is a Schneider Kreuznach Symmar-S 210mm. f / 5.6, and for both of these the locking ring step is 1mm. wide, and the hole in the boards should be the size of the locking ring step dia. , not the thread dia. since these both have index pin screwheads, and mate up with index holes in the boards. Which are on order for them. I would think the Speed's 12 3/4" of rail, could use these lenses effectively.
_________________ "Only you can capture a moment of time, in a fraction of time on film, with only your, eye, finger and camera!.....Why wait!!"
Speed Graphic 4X5in.
Pentax 6X7cm.
Canon A1-AE1 35mm. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2144 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2005-03-15 13:51, TiltallED wrote:
Thank you, for the replys!
( black M, red M, red F & black X, and black OFF positions) for flash bulbs and strobe/ electronic.
So to use with flash bulbs, I'll need selenoids and none with strobe's, from what I've read here. Is that correct?
One other question, to mount these to #0 boards, ( 1 mm. thick ) Can the locking ring be turned around if the hole in the board is just large enough (34 mm.) for the shutter threads, and the flange of the ring snuged up tight to the back of the board? As old as both of these are, they have not been mounted on boards before. I think they should be used, and not kept in a safety deposit box.
Since I first posted, I bought two other newer lenses for the Speed Graphic, both are in # 1 copal shutters, and they need boards also. 1) is Rodenstock Geronar MC 210 mm. f / 6.8, and 2) is a Schneider Kreuznach Symmar-S 210mm. f / 5.6, and for both of these the locking ring step is 1mm. wide, and the hole in the boards should be the size of the locking ring step dia. , not the thread dia. since these both have index pin screwheads, and mate up with index holes in the boards. Which are on order for them. I would think the Speed's 12 3/4" of rail, could use these lenses effectively.
| No solenoid should be needed for flash bulbs if you fire everything from the shutter. If the shutter speed is red, select red M. If black, black M.
Yes, if the reversed flange will hold, it will hold. Try it. Some of my lenses that came with flanges, not retaining rings, are held to their boards this way. See http://www.skgrimes.com for an explanation of the difference between a flange and a retaining ring.
You don't need to keep the locating pins. Most people remove them, most of the shops that drill boards and put lenses on them recommend removal.
Have someone who knows what he's doing drill boards for you. Modern standard (not Polaroid MP-4 to fit #1) retaining rings have a centering ridge. The hole in the board is drilled so the ridge will bite on it, is larger than the rear of the shutter's o/d.
Why did you get two 210s? Other things equal, the Symmar would have been more than enough.
Good luck, have fun,
Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
disemjg
Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 474 Location: Washington, DC
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have to echo Dan's question as to why you got two 210s. Either one of them would be enough; while Dan is right that the Symmar would be the top choice, I have a Geronar 210 and am amazed at its performance since it is a simple design and does not cost a lot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TiltallED
Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 9 Location: Pacific NW, Olympic Peninsula
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well ! The price was right, and I would try them both in the Speed G, but an Ebony 45S has caught my eye too!
And a 210 mm for it would start the lens system for it.
Besides I'm retired, and this Camera bug I've caught, is more fun than catching chickens for a Sunday dinner!
_________________ "Only you can capture a moment of time, in a fraction of time on film, with only your, eye, finger and camera!.....Why wait!!"
Speed Graphic 4X5in.
Pentax 6X7cm.
Canon A1-AE1 35mm. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|