View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was just playing with a new 12 inch Dagor. I searched out his lens because it was supposed to be good, supposed to be convertible, and was made about the same year as my camera. How could I pass it up?
But it brought up the question (for me anyway) about f-stops when converted. Of course the Dagor doesn't have a dual scale like my officially convertible lenses, which I never gave much thought.
After a quick test, I found the lens to be approximately 11 1/2 inches, and just over 23 inches with the front cell removed. That made me think of f-stops since there's no scale...
Here's my 'problem'...
Essentially going through the same lens but with twice the bellows draw is about the same as using a non-converted lens at a 1:1 mag ratio. That's 2 extra stops. Easy and makes sense... But... I'm only using half the lens! My thought would be that there should be more light getting through. So say 1 1/2 stops added when converted (rough guess).
That made sense till I looked at my other officially convertibles. On average, they add 2 1/2 stops when doubling the focal length with a cell removed. So they account for a 1/2 stop _less_ light hitting the film when using half the lens... That doesn't make sense to me...
So, as usual, here's the questions:
Is there any formula that would calc f-stops for a converted lens?
And does anyone know why there's a half stop less light hitting the film when going through half the lens elements?
I hope all that made snse? And yes I can measure the light falling on the GG to make a dual scale, but (again)... After checking the scale I made for a lens I swapped shutters, My scale for the double focal length is only about 1 1/8 stops over the normal focal length... Somthin wrong there... I'll have to do two lenses now
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alecj
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 853 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I sure don't know, but I do someone who I bet does. He doesn't post on this site, at least I don't remember seeing him here, but this is a perfect question for Richard Knoppow, whose address is dickburk@ix.netcom.com
[ This Message was edited by: alecj on 2005-02-22 19:00 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001 Posts: 1468 Location: South of Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alec, thanks. I've read quite a few post by Richard. He does tend to get technical at times I may pose the question someplace else, but I doubt I'd bother him with a private e-mail. I hate to intrude on people about as much as I enjoy trying to start conversations here
Charles, That's how I do the new scales. I _thought_ it worked at the time but now really doubt what I did was correct? So, since I have to double check that old Gundlach, I may as well do this lens too. Unfortunately, it's in a Compound shutter with the IBT switch right above the f-stop scale, so I can't make a continuouse new scale for the converted range. Looks like I'll miss two stops or so, but I can live with that...
[ This Message was edited by: RichS on 2005-02-22 20:14 ] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|