View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi group,
I have a beautiful Kodak Ektar f7.7 203mm lens on my Crown Graphic. I'm very pleased with it's performance but I have one nagging problem. No filter threads on the front element.
I have a 1-1/4" inside diameter Series VI slip-on, adapter ring, hood and filters for a 90mm lens. By bending the "tangs" inward slightly it's a perfect fit for that lens. The 90mm lens has a o.d. of 1-3/16" so the inward bend is no big deal but the 203 is a 1-5/16" o.d. I feel that bending the tangs outward slightly may be counter productive.
I know that the Series VI slip-on hoods were (are) available in many different diameters. So, should I get another 1-1/4 and bend outward or shop around for a slightly larger o.d. and bend inward?
What to do - what to do.
Thanks for your opinions.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2002 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd let fate decide what you get. go looking, if you can find a 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 cheap get that while you're looking for a 1 5/16. The next size up is 1 3/8, then 1 13/32, 1 7/16 and 1 15/32. There aren't any 32nd or milimeter sized between 1 5/616 and 1 3/8 (or weren't in june of '46 when my book was written) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2002 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Les,
I'll keep an eye peeled at E---- and my local camera show.
Regards,
Steve
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
45PSS
Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 Location: Mid Peninsula, Ca.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Given: 1inch=25.4mm
1 3/16 = 1.1875 x 25.4 = 30.1625mm or 30mm.
1 5/16 = 1.3125 x 25.4 = 33.3375mm or 33mm.
My closest at 31.5mm would be a r e a l s t r e a c h to fit, 32 to 34 easy adapt.
Charles
_________________ The best camera ever made is the one that YOU enjoy using and produces the image quality that satifies YOU. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for not s t r e a c h i n g
it too far.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nick
Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 494
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you want cheap and ugly? I needed the same thing for a process lens I got. It's got threads but they are some wierd threads so no go. What I ended up getting was a rubber lens hood that's basically the exact same size as the lens barrel. I then used duct tape. Works great. It's ugly but it comes off. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rangemaster
Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 Location: Montana, Glacier National Park
|
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2002 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used a small bit of gaffers tape around the edge of the lens, then found a step up ring that will screw over the gaffers tape and wala, I now have a 52mm filter flange on the front of my lens, works great and the gaffers tape does not leave any residue if I should decide to take it off, in addition to it being black so blends right in and looks great.
Dave Parker
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|