View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pv17vv
Joined: 22 Dec 2001 Posts: 255 Location: The Ardennes, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: K2 vs CK3 |
|
|
Hello all !
Just purchased a handfull of Series Kodak filters.
What is exactly the difference between yellow K2 and yellow CK3 ?
Why should still- and movie-cameras need different filters ?
Thanks.
Georges |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
C. Henry
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 360 Location: North East Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Georges;
My copy of the Photo Lab Index says that "K2" is an old designation for a #8 filter and "K3" for a #9 filter. A #9 is a deeper yellow than a #8. The PLI also indicates that a #9 will usually over correct cloud - clear sky contrast in black & white photography.
As for the "CK3" designation, I'm guessing that it was just a marketing ploy to try to convince amateur movie people that they need special filters instead of the more generally used ones.
C. Henry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well there's this scan of a kodak catalog that admits the CK3 is a cine filter, but it doesn't say why. the difference (at least in Kodak's graph) between a K2 and K3 (#8 and #9) is minimal,
But maybe movie film stock was slightly different than 35mm? and needed the sight difference between a K2 and K3? If so, why the Cine? why not just say K3 for movies?
A Marketing gimmick?
http://kodak.3106.net/index.php?p=303&cam=919 _________________ "In order to invent, you need a good imagination and a lot of junk" Thomas Edison |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
glennfromwy
Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 Location: S.W. Wyoming
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CK = cine Kodak. Why? I know nothing. _________________ Glenn
"Wyoming - Where everybody is somebody else's weirdo" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pv17vv
Joined: 22 Dec 2001 Posts: 255 Location: The Ardennes, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks my Friends.
Observation of said filter after a good cleaning shows two things :
1 it is a very small bit denser than K2
2 it is half thinner in the mount, as if one of both glasses was missing
K3 in plain glass instead of dyes between cemented glass ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
glennfromwy
Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 Location: S.W. Wyoming
|
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's very possible. Regular Wratten filters, such as the K-2 are gelatin between two glasses.
The CK-3 is probably dyed glass. It probably has a different spectral sensitivity, too. I'm going to speculate that it is a pro item. _________________ Glenn
"Wyoming - Where everybody is somebody else's weirdo" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|